Katteb
Comparison

Katteb vs ChatGPT

OpenAI retired agent mode in August 2026 and moved multi-step work into ChatGPT Work with a cloud browser. If you came here from a dead agent-mode tab, this is the honest read.

Katteb

katteb.com

vs
ChatGPT

openai.com

Built from their own published pricing and documentation, checked in September 2026.

The short answer

Choose Katteb if

  • The job is inside your own accounts: post it, publish it, message them, update the store.
  • You want it to keep running on a schedule without you in the tab.
  • You need more than forty agent tasks a month, from a browser that is still signed in tomorrow.

A browser agent on our servers with a Chrome profile of your own, and a toolbelt that writes the files on the server.

Choose ChatGPT if

  • You want the strongest general model for thinking, writing and analysis, and the agent is a bonus.
  • Your work is research and documents rather than signed-in websites.
  • You are already paying for ChatGPT and want one subscription, not two.

The strongest general model, with a cloud browser attached to it.

The difference, line by line

The lines that actually change the day, not a feature count.

Katteb ChatGPT
What it is A browser agent with its own real Chrome profile on our servers, plus a toolbelt for files, data and media. A chat assistant with a cloud browser. Agent mode itself was retired in August 2026.
Where the browser runs On Katteb's servers, always on, one dedicated profile per account. OpenAI's own cloud browser.
Your signed-in accounts You sign in once inside your own agent browser and the session stays. You sign in inside their browser. Driving a logged-in session and handing control back mid-task is not what ChatGPT Work covers.
Exit IP address A static ISP address tied to your host, the same one on every run. OpenAI's datacentre address.
CAPTCHA Solved inside the run. A known failure point while agent mode existed.
Price before you run it The plan card shows the hold (200 credits) before you press Run. Bundled in the subscription and metered as a monthly allowance of agent messages.
A task that fails Not charged at all, and the hold comes straight back. Counts against that allowance.
Ceiling on one task 1,500 credits a task on the entry plan, and we absorb the rest. Agent mode allowed 40 tasks a month on Plus and 400 on Pro.
Scheduling Daily, weekly, or only when you click. Scheduled prompts, yes. A scheduled signed-in browser session, no.
Files it produces PowerPoint with real charts, PDF, CSV, images, video, music, and voice notes in your own recorded voice. Documents, spreadsheets, slides, code, images.
Where you talk to it Web, an installable app, Telegram and Slack. Web, desktop, mobile.
Entry price $19 a month, agents included. From $20 a month on Plus.

Built from their own published pricing and documentation, checked in September 2026. Their site

Three differences that matter

Not features we counted. Three decisions in the architecture.

One browser, one identity

Your agent works in its own Chrome profile on our server, from a static IP, and stays signed in between one task and the next. The others either open a fresh sandbox per task and inject your session into it, or drive the browser on your own laptop, which then has to be awake. A task that runs on LinkedIn at 3am needs a steady identity, not a new sandbox.

You see the price before you run it

A task holds 200 credits and settles at what it really cost, and a task that fails is charged nothing. The rest of this category bills from a credit pool that drains whether the task worked or not, with no budget stop to catch it.

A run you can talk to, and stop without losing it

Send a message while a task is running and it is delivered to the agent mid-flight rather than queued for the next one. When it hits a login wall or a real decision it stops and asks you instead of guessing. Press Stop and it wraps up, hands you the report and the files it already made, and charges only for the part that ran.

What a task costs, before you run it

The loudest complaint in this whole category is that the price only appears after it is gone. Here is the entire policy.

Before it runs

It holds 200 credits, then you pay what the run really cost.

If it fails

You are charged nothing. Stop it halfway and you pay for the part that ran.

The ceiling

1,500 credits a task on the entry plan, and we absorb the rest.

Questions people ask

OpenAI's help centre marked it as no longer available in August 2026 and pointed people at ChatGPT Work for multi-step tasks and at the cloud browser for browser workflows. Plenty of workflows people had built on it stopped working, which is why comparison pages like this one exist.

Not for chatting. Katteb Chat carries the leading models, including OpenAI's, so you do not lose the model. What Katteb adds is the part ChatGPT does not do: a persistent browser that stays signed in to your accounts and finishes work on a schedule.

Not reliably, and not unattended. It browses from its own datacentre in a session you opened, with no persistent profile and a documented CAPTCHA problem. Katteb was built for that specific job: your profile, your static address, a solver in the loop.

Over a hundred, including GPT, Claude and Gemini, priced per message from one balance. You pick the model per conversation, and the agent runs on the model we have measured as best for browser work.

Other comparisons

The same lines, against other platforms.

Put it on one real task

Every plan includes the agents, from $19 a month. A free account opens the whole model catalogue to try in chat, and an agent run starts when a plan does.